HiQuiPs: Electronic Health Record Systems and the Emergency Department

Updated: Feb 24

Authors: Mark Hewitt, Seyon Sathiaseelan, Justin Majnarich, Ahmed Taher


You are working on a busy overnight shift in your local emergency department. You are comfortable with your flow, but feel that you are subject to some inefficiencies including finding the next patient’s chart, and different paper order sets, and having to write out lengthy discussions that you had with patients. You are often forced to put on your detective hat as you try to decipher previous handwritten notes in your patient’s chart. Your hospital is moving towards implementing a new electronic health record (EHR) system in the coming year and you are curious about whether the new health record system will solve your inefficiencies.


Welcome to another HiQuiPs post. In our previous Health Informatics posts we discussed an introduction to biomedical health informatics as well as computerized order entry and patient safety. For this post, we take a step back and discuss the basics of EHR systems as preparation for their use in the ED context. You may wonder why this is important for clinicians? ED clinicians learn the basics of many tools they use including casting material, the slit lamp, suturing material, and their stethoscope. Learning the basics of EHR systems empowers clinicians to better use these tools and their many functionalities, to have better discussions with their information technology specialists about optimization or troubleshooting, and to build solutions that better fit their clinical context and workflow.


Electronic Health Records

People refer to electronic health, patient, or medical records as well as personal health records. Several of these terms appear to be used interchangeably but have some small differences as illustrated by the Canada Infoway definitions: ​(1)​


Electronic Medical Record: A partial health record under the custodianship of the healthcare provider(s), which holds a portion of the relevant health information about a person over their lifetime. Often used within the bounds of the organization. For example, the system that is present in a general practitioner’s office. Electronic Health Record: A complete health record under the custodianship of healthcare provider(s) that holds all relevant health information about a person over their lifetime. This can be used across organizations in a longitudinal manner. For example, a hospital electronic health record system that can share and receive information with other systems and organizations. Personal Health Record: A complete or partial health record under the custodianship of a person(s) (e.g. a patient or family member) that holds all or a portion of the relevant health information about that person over their lifetime. For example, current consumer products include Apple Health or Google Fit profiles.


For a clinician’s everyday use, usually we refer to EHRs, EMRs, or electronic patient records (EPRs) interchangeably to denote an electronic system to document and gather information about patients. Moreover, when used today in the clinical realm we are often referring to the EHR system that contains active tools to manage the information and integrate with other electronic tools used in patient care to facilitate information sharing and decision making.


EHR System functional components

When clinicians think of EHRs they mainly think of the documentation. However, there are five basic functional components of an EHR system:​ (2​)


Integrated view of patient data Patient data is found across various forms including text, images, videos, lab and radiology information system findings, administrative data, etc. Each form of data can have its own form of storage and standards related to its use (more on this in a future post!). This allows the integration of multiple sources of data with potential ease of access, privacy oversight and efficiency. If you do use an EHR system, think about what you can access with a couple of clicks.


Clinician order entry A function that allows clinicians to make decisions and enter orders. This function forgoes errors from misreading handwriting. It can also use evidence-based orders, i.e. logic built into orders or order sets, time stamps, data collection on physician care practices, and integrated billing functions. An illustration of this was discussed in our previous post on computerized order entry and adverse drug reactions.


Clinical decision support These functions go hand-in-hand with the clinician order entry. Decision support aids in the decision-making and safe provision of care. This support harnesses the power of computing and increasingly, the presence of artificial intelligence (AI). From dosage calculations, reminders, alerts, and built-in algorithms. The EHR system can be infused with evidence-based diagnostic and treatment approaches that assist clinicians in decision making.


Access to knowledge resources This is a capability to retrieve more information on clinical questions that arise. Often these can be linked through commercial vendors such as electronic textbooks, UptoDate, MicroMedex, etc.


Integrated communication and reporting support Given the increasingly complex and multidisciplinary interactions of clinicians across the patient care continuum, timely communication is an integral component. EHR systems can allow for clearly delineated reporting of the different clinical care teams across a patient’s care continuum. Functions may also exist to support direct communication between different clinicians through the EHR system, or even patients.


The EHR system as you will notice is a comprehensive system that allows for integration of information, knowledge generation, and decision making. Figure 1. illustrates a schematic of some of these basic functions. The user is depicted on the right of the figure interacting with the system on the left through the user interface (vertical line).



Basic functions of electronic health records (Source:)

Best of Breed vs Monolithic Systems

Over the years, EHR systems have evolved beyond their basic functions. For example, EHR systems are now collecting data through wearable technology​, and giving patients access to their own health records.(3,4) There are also new systems for specific specialties such as pathology-specific database, and intensive care unit modules for critical care continuous patient monitoring, etc. With increasing functionalities EHR system users find two basic setups in their organizations.​(2)


Monolithic Systems This is a single large system that contains all functions that are used by the organization such as in Figure 1. These systems usually come with standard functions and design from the vendor and may allow some personalization depending on the clinical needs and workflow. Data sharing across applications is usually simplified as it is housed under one system with shared functional standards. However, the specialized functions are limited by the amount of personalization that is allowed.


Best of Breed Systems These are systems that are built with highly specialized functionality for each clinical context. Organizations would typically have to purchase different systems for each of their needs. This approach would allow better specialization for each clinical context but typically can run into challenges with information flow, needing the development of interfaces (ways to communicate and share data) between each of their systems. Imagine that each system needs a different interface with every other system that is present as illustrated in Figure 2. This becomes an exponential challenge when large organizations have 10s to 100s of different interfaces. ​



Interfaces between best of breed systems (Source:)

Summary

EHR systems have basic functions that allow clinicians to document, retrieve information enter orders, and make decisions. Systems differ in complexity and in structure. EHR systems can be seen as a tool that is used as part of a clinician’s workflow. An understanding of the tool can empower clinicians to better use it and better engage with their information technology specialists to optimize it for their clinical domain.


You are excited about the upcoming roll-out of an EHR system in your department. No more deciphering unintelligible scrawl! You wonder if a monolithic system would meet all of the needs of the ED clinicians and you make a note to bring this up for further discussion at your next department meeting.


Let us know what you think on Twitter at @Hi_Qui_Ps. If there is anything specific you would like to learn about, e-mail us at hiquips@gmail.com.


Senior Editor: Shawn Mondoux

Copyedited by: Mark Hewitt


References

  1. Hodge T. EMR, EHR, and PHR – Why All the Confusion? https://research.usask.ca/our-impact/highlights/the-conversation-canada/your-electronic-health-data-understanding-the-different-records,-systems-and-how-they-connect.php Published April 2011. Accessed March 27, 2020.

  2. Shortliffe EH, Cimino JJ, eds. Biomedical Informatics. 4th ed. London:Springer; 2014. Available from: DOI:10.1007/978-1-4471-4474-8

  3. Al-Azwani I, Aziz H. Integration of Wearable Technologies into Patients’ Electronic Medical Records. Quality in Primary Care [Internet]. 2016;24(4):151-155. Available from: https://qspace.qu.edu.qa/bitstream/handle/10576/4713/Integration%20of%20Wearable%20Technologies%20into%20Patients%E2%80%99%20Electronic%20Medical%20Records.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y

  4. Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon K, Straus S. Personal health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc [Internet]. 2011;18(4):515-522. Available from: DOI:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000105

9 views0 comments