Emergency Physician Patterns Related to Anticoagulation of Patients with Recent-Onset Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter

CAN-EL-Anticoagulation Use Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter

Canada (ED)

Guidelines   strongly recommend long-term anticoagulation with warfarin for patients with   newly recognized AF who have high embolic risk by virtue of a   CHADS2 (Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Age >65, Diabetes,   History of Stroke) score ≥ 2. The goal of this study was to determine   patterns of emergency department-initiated anticoagulation among eligible   patients discharged from Canadian centers with an episode of recent-onset   atrial fibrillation and flutter (RAFF) and determine if decision-making is   driven by the CHADS2 score or other factors. This was accomplished by   examining health records using uniform case identification and data   abstraction as well as centralized quality control; it was conducted in 8   Canadian university emergency departments over a 12-month period. Eligible   patients for this analysis demonstrated RAFF requiring emergency management,   were not already taking warfarin and were not admitted to hospital.   Univariate analyses were conducted using T-test or Chi-square to select   factors associated with anticoagulation initiation at a significance level of   p < 0.15 and multiple logistic regression was employed to evaluate   independent predictors after adjustment for confounders. Among 633 eligible   patients, only 21 out of 120 patients (18%) with a CHADS2 score ≥ 2   received anticoagulation and among 70 patients who were given anticoagulation   only 21 (30%) had a CHADS2 score ≥ 2. Independent predictors of   anticoagulation included age by 10-year strata: (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.3 - 2.1),   heparin use in the anticoagulation (OR = 9.6; 95% CI 4.9 - 18.9), a new   prescription for metoprolol (OR = 9.6; 95% CI 4.9 - 18.9) and being referred   to cardiology for follow-up (OR = 5.6; 95% CI 2.6 - 12.0). CHADS2 ≥ 2   doubled the likelihood of being prescribed anticoagulation (OR= 2.0; 95% CI   1.5 - 3.5) but was not an independent predictor. It was thus determined that   patients discharged from the emergency department in this study were not   prescribed anticoagulation in keeping with current recommendations. This   practice gap merits further investigation and may benefit from educational   efforts or enhanced support for anticoagulation use from the emergency   department.


Authors: Paraish Misra, Eddy Lang, Catherine M Clement, Robert J Brison, Brian H Rowe, Bjug Borgundvaag, Trevor Langhan, Kirk Magee, Rob Stenstrom, Jeffrey J Perry, David Birnie, George A Wells, X Xue, G Innes, Ian G Stiell

Eddy Lang - eddy.lang@ahs.ca

Preliminary data gathering/ baseline